Speaker 1: This is off track.
Speaker 2: Blue Jays bro. Holy crap dude. How about that?
Speaker 1: How about that? Here's what I've always said about
baseball and basketball back home is
because we've got one team for the entire country,
it really does unite the country in a very cool way.
And like hockey fractures, Canada baseball
and basketball bring it all together.
And like you'll be traveling out in Vancouver
or something in Western Canada
and you'll see somebody with a JS a, you'll be like,
oh my God, why does he have a Js a?
Oh, right. 'cause that's all we have.
That's literally the only baseball team in the country. Do,
Speaker 2: Do you wanna know what blows in my mind is the,
the Raptors have been good off
and on for the better part of a decade.
Um, the Blue Jays have been good off and on for a while.
Um, and Toronto with, its with, it's
the way the tax situation is set up, it's very hard
to get athletes to come play for Toronto.
Sure. Is just because it sure is.
You're paying a lot more in taxes as an athlete
to live in Toronto than you would be if you played in
Chicago or Detroit or whatever, and
Speaker 1: Miami.
Speaker 2: Right. Any of the 50 states, um,
that have an California FBA or well sure.
MLB team. Um, and yet they're still able to attract some
of the best players in the world to come play there.
So that just goes to show
how good those organizations must be from like a management
standpoint, because people are willing
to make a substantially less money
to play for these teams.
So the quality of of life must be pretty good
for them to make that decision. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Yeah, for sure.
It's a great point. And I think that it also kind
of forces the teams to be
a little bit more aggressive maybe on finding young
talent and bringing them up.
Mm. Right. And taking risks on guys to, to nurture them into
what becomes stars.
We definitely have seen that a lot with the Raptors.
We're like, we'll get these good players
and then people will be like, oh, they're really good.
We'll take them. You know, . Yeah, for sure. For sure.
So it's, it's been a stepping stone kind
of place, uh, in some ways.
But No, it's, it's a great point.
And like, it's the same in hockey. I know.
You've got more options.
There's six teams up there, so it's,
it's a different conversation.
But like, if you're being asked to go play for the Panthers
or the Leafs and they're both good, you're like, yeah,
but I could have no state income tax in Florida.
That sounds cool. Mm-hmm .
So, yeah, there's, I think part of what it is,
is those teams have such a support system behind them
and such a fan base
and playing for them, like mean something
in a, in a different way.
Uh, I think that helps kind of bridge that gap too
and, and make that happen.
But anyway, yeah. Series tied up at two, that game
that went 18 innings ridiculous.
Speaker 2: Didn't watch Speaker 1: So glad didn't watch.
I didn't stay, I didn't stay up for it. I couldn't. But
Speaker 2: What's funny is everyone, everyone was like, oh, the, uh,
this, that was the death sentence for, for, for the Jays
because, you know, 18 innings, they're not
as deep as the Dodgers.
They're gonna be tired. All this sort of thing.
First of all, first of all,
these are professional athletes, right?
And aside from the pitcher
and aside from Tani who was on base like nine times,
it's a lot of, it's a lot of standing.
Like I know it's, you're, you're always on alert
and you're always having to be ready
because you never know when a ball's coming your way
and you gotta make a huge play sort of thing.
So it's, it's a very anxious and stressful situation,
but it's not that taxing on your body.
So like, when everyone was like, oh, they're screwed
'cause 'cause they're not gonna be able to do it.
It's like, well, no. First of all,
they're, they're pretty fit.
Second of all, they're in a must win situation. Mm-hmm.
Um, and they're pretty good at baseball.
And, and, and also like, you got potentially the hottest
batter in the league right now with, uh,
with uh, flat, what's his face?
Flatty. So it's
Speaker 3: No idea.
Game idea. You care about baseball. I
Speaker 1: Canadian, Speaker 2: I, no,
I care about things when it's the World
Series, the Stanley Cup.
When it's the masters, I don't give a fuck about
regular season baseball.
Couldn't care less. Right.
I don't about the Dodgers or the Blue Jays,
but what I love is, I love seeing the two best
compete in a Best of Seven series.
Yeah. On a Tuesday night. Like, what more could you ask for?
Speaker 1: Right. What else has happened on a Tuesday night?
Exactly. Yeah. Um,
Speaker 3: Um, I, I'll tell you what blew my mind.
I didn't know people from Toronto were called Torontonians.
Speaker 1: How did you not know that?
What did you say they were called?
Speaker 3: I didn't, I I've never given any thought,
but he just said Toronto winds or whatever.
So I was like, oh, I wonder what that is.
And I looked it up and it's Torontonians
and that just sounds my up.
Speaker 1: You could have, I'm sorry,
you guys call yourselves Angelenos.
Speaker 3: Well first of all, I'm a Hoosier.
Speaker 1: You know what I mean? Speaker 2: , I mean,
arguably more stupid. Yeah.
Speaker 1: You Speaker 3: Know why ourselves, Hoosiers, we don't
Speaker 1: Just do we.
Speaker 2: Exactly. Speaker 1: Because literally nobody knows
why that that name
Speaker 2: Exists. Super. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Anyway. Speaker 3: Okay. Well you guys are both losing your
honorary Hoosier status. I
Speaker 1: Feel like as long as I pay taxes here, I'm allowed
to call myself a Hoosier.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: So you don't actually,
I think you're losing your honest,
that's fair. Hoosier status.
Speaker 3: Apparently Hoosiers is an insult in Missouri.
Speaker 1: Well, I think it started as a, there's a couple,
we're not getting into the theories
of Hosier and where it came from.
'cause there're, there's like three prevailing ones
and they're all pretty obscure.
But yeah. One of 'em is not like super complimentary. Mm.
Speaker 3: But I'll take it. Speaker 1: Just, I
Speaker 3: Mean, neither was Yankee, you know?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I think that's, yeah, that's a good point.
Now there's a whole very successful
organization built around that name. So
Speaker 2: Anyways, let's not get into franchise
naming 'cause that's a slippery slope. .
Speaker 1: See, I wasn't even talking about the Yankees.
I was talking about the term Yankee,
but that's No, yes, I know.
But I'm saying they've, they've taken it now
and have made it anyway.
Um, so yeah.
Go Jays, hopefully that keeps going the right way.
At least we know that for sure.
It's going to a, at least a game six.
So we'll go back to Toronto. Yeah.
Which has made me like really think about maybe going home
for 24 hours and, uh, I know a pilot
Speaker 2: If you need one. Do you have an
Speaker 1: In?
I don't, I haven't. I'm sure there's a way.
I'm sure there's a way. I would just go buy tickets.
I gotta just go scalp tickets. I don't even care.
Just like being in that dome during what could be.
Like I went to one of the World Series games as a kid in 93.
We used to have season tickets to the Blue Jays.
And like my dad said, he was like, okay, you can go
to game four
and it's a guarantee that you'll get to see a game
or you can hold out for one
of the later games, but we might not make it.
And I was like, oh, well I'm gonna
take the guarantee I want to see.
And sure enough, I should not have done that.
'cause we ended up making it and winning it.
But, um, I have been to
World Series games at the, what was then skydome,
which is now Ro Roger Center before.
And it brings back a lot of fun memories.
I was like texting my mom, uh,
what not last night, one of the games before.
I just saying like, it's so cool.
Like, I'm, I'm into this again in a way
that I haven't been probably since the last
time they were in the World Series.
And it just bring back these cool memories from childhood.
So I would love to, I dunno if it's possible, but,
Speaker 2: Um, I, if, if I wasn't going to be in LA
with our esteemed colleague Timothy, um,
and watching Ponies run, I, I would definitely go with you,
but, uh, that's
Speaker 1: A Speaker 2: Bummer. Alas, I cannot
Speaker 1: Can.
But I mean, your pony runs a lot of times a year.
Blue Jays are only in the World Series. My pony
Speaker 2: Is not running at all.
My Pony's in New Orleans talked
Speaker 1: About.
So are you in California to watch
Speaker 2: On Tuesday?
It's breed's cup.
Speaker 1: Are you just going as a horse fan
or is there like some sort of
Speaker 2: Horse fan?
Cocktail fan. Okay. That fan. Okay. Food fan.
Speaker 1: Got it. Yeah. Breeders Cup. All right.
Speaker 2: Tim Fan.
Speaker 1: I don't know if I'm gonna buy that one. I get it. I get
it. Speaker 2: ,
Speaker 1: What do you guys, how do you guys feel about Pears?
The fruit? Not like pro, generally. Pro.
EAR not a IR. Um,
Speaker 2: Against Speaker 1: Why, why are you against Pears?
Speaker 2: I just don't like 'em. Speaker 1: Do you like apples?
Speaker 2: I do. Speaker 1: So I mean, what do you like about apples
that you don't like about pears?
Well, apples are crunchy because I have a theory. Okay.
Speaker 2: Apples are crunchy. Pears are
not, don't taste like an apple.
Speaker 1: No, they taste better. That's what I'm getting at.
I'm pretty sure. I think the taste of a pea is better.
It is juicier. Mm.
It is more flavorful, but it's a <inaudible> mess.
I think pears have fallen below apples in the,
like, commonality
Speaker 2: Fruit.
So it's less many than, it's less
messy than like a pomegranate. Yeah. But also
Speaker 1: Not a very popular fruit for just walking around
and putting your lunch bag
as a kid and like, you know, walk around.
I'll have an apple, you know?
Speaker 2: Right. I mean, the ultimate fruit for travel is banana.
It's,
Speaker 1: It, you safe for Speaker 2: Travel, self-contained.
Speaker 3: But once you start it, you have to finish.
Speaker 2: It's, you're, you put a
Speaker 1: Half, half, half half in your backpack on
Speaker 3: A plane.
That's fair. That's fair. But I'm thinking there's gotta be
something like a grape
where you just have like multiple self-contained, small ones
Speaker 1: Grape in like a Tupperware,
but then you'd have to have the Tupperware at the end.
Yeah. Right. That's where like you throw,
I was, you know, again, I was
Speaker 2: Thinking it's Speaker 1: Definitely not as more
Speaker 2: The sanitary fact that you don't have to wash it.
Like Yeah. You just peel a banana
and you eat it and you're done. And it's,
Speaker 1: And it's not messy.
There's no residue. It's not messy.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Speaker 1: It's great for you. No, it's
probably, it's a good shout.
Yeah. Yeah. Like, yeah. Which the
Speaker 2: On which go fruit is a banana.
It's not my favorite fruit at all. I actually don't.
What's your favorite fruit? But I
love the convenience of it.
My favorite fruit is a sumo orange.
Speaker 1: Okay. Yeah. What, what
Speaker 3: Can't you just say orange?
Just like, why do you gotta be the way that you are? ,
Speaker 1: Be less you, can you? Yeah. So
Speaker 2: A sumo a sumo orange.
So check this out. So check this out. Is a Japanese guy, .
And
Speaker 3: Can I just, I just wanna interrupt
because I wanna tell you why I hate this right now.
I'm gonna try this orange
and I'm gonna be like, damnit, he's right.
Yeah. Speaker 1: .
Speaker 2: Well, here's what's gonna stop you.
It's like $4 75 an orange. So seems aggressive.
Speaker 1: I'm willing to do one. Speaker 2: It's a, it's a genetically,
so you know, those, you know those oranges
that when you look at 'em in the store,
they're the like really warty ones
and you're like, what the <inaudible>,
what the fuck is that?
Like why would I buy that?
Like, it's a, it's not a good looking orange.
Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 2: Like, this skin's super thick
and it's got the point and all this sort. Yeah.
Speaker 1: It's warty and stuff. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Well this is a genetically modified citrus
that a guy in Japan created.
And he was like, I love oranges,
but I hate the, the randomness of an orange.
Like sometimes you have a great orange
and then you grab another one
and it's trash, it's dry, it's sour, it's not juicy.
All this sort of thing. And he was like,
I also don't like the little white stringy things
on an orange because like mm-hmm .
You, you either eat it
or you spend extra time peeling it, it gets on your fingers
and it's a mess and whatever.
Right. And third, I don't like the seeds.
So he was like, I'm gonna create the perfect citrus.
So he created the sumo orange,
which has none of the white stuff.
Every single one is bomb diggity and it's seedless.
So like you are getting the full orange experience without
any of the bullshit a hundred percent of the time.
Speaker 1: Okay. Okay. Speaker 3: I'm for it. The
Speaker 1: Genetically altered part.
I, I can't tell if I care about or not. I feel like I should
Speaker 3: Counter, I Speaker 1: Dunno what I do.
Speaker 3: I don't know that, did you know lemons are
not naturally occurring? We invented them
Speaker 1: Actually.
Yeah, I did know that. Yeah. Okay. All right.
You're onto something there.
And this sort of thing is used in other areas
of agriculture. Fine.
Speaker 2: Yeah. We're not talking about like creating humans here.
Speaker 1: Okay. So let me ask you this. It's alive.
Let's say you bought a normal orange
and it was one of the ones that just happened to be good.
Like it's gonna have the white
stringy things on it. Fine. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: Yeah. And
Speaker 1: Seeds, but like, and seeds.
But it's just, it's just good. Mm-hmm .
Are you gonna say that
that orange is better than any other fruit as well?
Because you just really love the taste
of a good orange and sum?
Orange is just win because they're consistently good.
Speaker 2: Right. Right. I would say, I would say it's really close
between that and like in cherries.
Speaker 1: Oh, nice. Okay. I like that. But yeah,
Speaker 2: I like that mean that it's
probably a tie between those two.
But cherries are hard
'cause it, they're only good for
like one or two months a year.
Right. Whereas again,
Speaker 3: Well, they killed Zachary Taylor get
Speaker 2: It all the time. Is
Speaker 1: That like a president or something?
Yeah. I don't know why I knew that. Um,
Speaker 3: He died because he ate too many
cherries and drank too much milk.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I, yeah, we, we, we gathered.
Um, do you know the difference?
This was a con this is actually just reminds me
of a conversation that came up in the, uh,
production trailer at an IndyCar race
with my beloved Fox colleagues.
Um, we were talking about favorite fruit
and then Georgia actually was like, well,
what's your favorite, like, casual fruit
and your favorite non casuals fruit?
And I walked in and in this conversation I'm like,
I'm, I'm sorry. Good
Speaker 3: Answer.
No, good question. Peas for casual kiwi for not casual.
Speaker 1: Wow. Okay. So you actually kind
of understand what she means by that.
Yeah. Because we went into a whole debate about
what classified a casual or a non casuals fruit.
What was, how did you, yeah, I don't understand.
How did you define?
You don't understand why there's a question. Yeah.
Speaker 3: It just seems obvious to me.
'cause like, yeah, there's gonna be some fruits
where it's gonna be a thing.
You're not gonna sit down
and like casually have a kiwi
because that's a process. Wild
Speaker 1: Though, is but, but people eat kiwis through the skin.
Speaker 3: Well, those people are psychopaths. That's
Speaker 1: Well, I married to one.
Speaker 3: Well, we need to end that .
Isn't it like a fuzzy, isn't it like fuzzy?
Why did, why didn't you tell us this earlier?
We need to extricate you from this situation as soon as
Speaker 1: Possible.
Blink. Blink twice if you're in trouble. .
No, I also, not all the time, but she can.
And apparently you can. It's apparently a thing.
And, but,
but, so we kind of tried to define the difference
between casual and non casuals.
Fruit was like, if you have to do anything to it to eat it,
it becomes non casuals. So like, okay.
Speaker 3: But no key a Speaker 1: For example, but
Speaker 3: Like, you gotta peel a banana, you gotta peel an orange.
Speaker 1: Right? But like, those are pretty cough.
Speaker 3: You have to dehydrate a raisin,
Speaker 1: You know?
So I would not consider raisins a casual fruit under any
circumstances whatsoever.
Really? Yeah. I barely consider them a fruit, but I don't,
Speaker 3: I mean, they're not dehydrated,
Speaker 1: But isn't a grape of fruit.
Speaker 2: Sure is. But, so would you classify
Speaker 3: Like the, okay.
Speaker 2: Would you classify, um, olives as a fruit? I hate
Speaker 3: That they are, aren't they?
Speaker 2: Yeah. But like, yeah, Speaker 1: They're on
Speaker 2: As and they're pit or Speaker 3: Are they seeds?
Speaker 2: No, they're fruits. Speaker 1: Or they've got a pit.
Speaker 3: They're fruit. Right? Yeah.
Speaker 1: I hate that. It's like a, it's like a peach, but gross.
Speaker 2: I mean, so essentially interesting.
Essentially a, a dirty martini's
healthy, it's might as well. Well, yeah.
Speaker 3: I think we've all known that it's a
Speaker 1: Fruit beverage.
Yeah. I'm having, I'm having a fruity beverage.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Speaker 1: Gin martini.
Speaker 3: Um, um, but all alcohol's healthy
or they wouldn't use it at hospitals.
Speaker 2: You're not consuming it.
Speaker 1: Yeah. You're, you're using your
alcohol in a different way than they are. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah. They're using Speaker 1: It's
Speaker 2: Sterilize.
Speaker 3: To which paraphrase?
New girl rubbing alcohol for my outside injuries,
drinking alcohol for my inside injuries.
Speaker 1: That is very depressing and sad, but accurate.
I was gonna say like, either, either, uh, pineapple
or grapefruit would be my non casuals favorite fruit.
Speaker 2: Grapefruit, eh, with or without sugar?
Speaker 1: Without just bitter as, yeah.
What I like about grapefru Butterball, I don't like,
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's a mother, but it's, it's good.
Speaker 1: It's, it's a pain. Grapefruit.
It's a little, it's a lot of work.
But what I like about them is you eat.
So I, you know, you split it in half
and I like cut out all the little squares.
Mm-hmm . And I eat it with a spoon,
obviously. And that's delicious.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And Speaker 1: Then you can squeeze it into the bowl.
And then you get the juice too.
So it's almost like you get two meals
outta it. Yeah. And then
Speaker 2: You get two experiences.
Like if a bottle of tequila's next
to you, you've got a cocktail.
Speaker 1: It's a nice, it's a nice cocktail.
It's, it's a nice Paloma. It's
Speaker 2: Called Paloma. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1: And um, so yeah, I'm, I think I'm, but, but,
but I do love pineapple.
I do, but pineapple, I feel like you can get bad. Pineapple.
I haven't really had like a, a bad grapefruit. Grapefruit.
Speaker 2: All free. Would you choose a for the work?
Would you choose a pineapple over a
watermelon? Good Watermelon.
Speaker 1: Good Watermelon is pretty good.
And not that much work compared to a pineapple.
Speaker 2: I mean, arguably less.
Speaker 1: I would, yeah, I would say it's less.
I'm saying it's, yeah. Compared, it's not as,
Speaker 2: I mean, if you have a sharp knife,
it's really no worth at all.
Speaker 1: I don't love the seeds in a watermelon. I don't
Speaker 2: Keep them. Well that's seedless.
Speaker 1: I don't love. I know. So we're gonna go seedless.
That's a different conversation. Well,
Speaker 2: Everything, if you can get anything
seedless, you should get it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's true. Especially Kiwis. I hate kiwi seeds.
Speaker 2: Okay. Fun story. And then we need to move on, like pretty.
Yeah. So we are at the point in Ben's life,
we're introducing solids slowly.
Okay. And so number one was,
um, banana.
Right? That's like, I feel like the def defacto
Speaker 1: Number barely solid. Yeah. For
Speaker 2: First thing, right?
You mush it up and you give it to 'em. Hated it.
They were like, all right. What about avocado? Hated it.
Okay. This is, this is going well. I
Speaker 1: Like brunch, Speaker 2: Uh, peas.
Kids love mushed up. Peas hate it.
Speaker 1: It good man. We want peas.
Speaker 2: Fourth thing that he tried Kiwi. Yeah, love kiwi.
Oh yeah. Which is wild
because like, that's not, it's not like a No,
Speaker 1: That's a weird one.
Speaker 2: Yeah. It's not like an an, uh,
a just a super forward facing. It's sweet. It's
Speaker 1: Very flavorful.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. It's just like a, I don't know.
Speaker 1: And the seeds like, it's like sand weird. Okay.
You tell him that one day he can just eat 'em
like an apple if he wants.
No, no. Do not tell him that.
Well, part of tell him he's, well, he's wondering
Speaker 2: Kicked outta the house if he does that part
of me is wondering if like his aunt Becky
ate a kiwi in front of him like that.
So that's why he thinks he likes Kiwi. He
Speaker 1: Does have a low key crush on Aunt Becky.
So that might be maybe he's trying to her It
Speaker 2: Was though.
Speaker 1: No, not anymore. . not as
of, not as of 12 minutes ago when he learned
that she sometimes eats Kiwis through the skin.
Speaker 2: Oh boy. We have something to talk about.
What happened as of 23 minutes ago, 20 time
Indy 500 starter in 2006, Indy car, rookie of the year,
Marco Andretti has announced his
retirement from motor racing. Wow.
Speaker 1: There you go. How did all three of us miss that?
Speaker 2: I had Speaker 1: No idea. I literally,
I literally went on racer right
before we started recording just
to like see if there was anything new and exciting.
And that must have been 24 minutes ago. . Yeah. Yeah.
Wow. Okay. Alright.
Speaker 2: Hey, I honestly, congrats.
I'm, I'm, I am I'm happy that you two are both like Yeah,
no, I'm glad none of us knew.
Congrats to Marco.
I think I,
I don't think it's often talked about enough.
The challenge that he had despite some of the advantages
that he had, the challenge that he had,
because you know, there are,
there are quite a few drivers, right.
Who are second generation mm-hmm .
And there's this, there's this expectation whether
that be from the fan base or the family
or the, the media
or whatever that whatever accomplishments the older
generation did, the younger generation should do,
should at least match or do better than,
and Marco not only had to deal with second generation,
but he had to deal with third generation.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And, and like tears generation
because of his uncles, you know?
Speaker 2: Right. So despite the advantages
that he had in terms of coming up in a racing family
and having the support of a grandfather
and a father who were in the racing industry,
like there's no free lunch.
And there are a lot of challenges
that I'm sure he could speak to, um, about
why in some ways
that probably made his career
harder than it should have been.
Yeah. Um, so I just, I think that he deserves a huge amount
of praise for, for a being a professional race car driver
for the better part of two dec two decades plus.
Um, and also being able to go out on his own terms.
Like, that's, that's pretty cool.
Speaker 1: That's very cool. And, and you're totally right.
I mean that's, uh, that is a, that is a double-edged sword
if there ever was one.
And uh, yeah. He handled it, he handled it well.
All things considered. 'cause that's some pretty big shoes
to fill on the, uh, on the old edge ready family tree.
But like you say, I mean two decades
in the sport, that's huge.
I, uh, yeah man, congratulations buddy.
He's now gets to focus fully on being a dad
and his other business ventures.
'cause he is always been an,
an entrepreneur in his spare time.
And, uh, that's awesome. I'm very excited for him.
Did you just text him right now? ?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah. Same. I'll be texting. Do we
Speaker 3: All just, do we always do that
Speaker 1: Do we, do we just do this in a group chat?
I'm gonna wait, I'm gonna wait till afterwards. Um, wow.
Okay. So there you go. That's official.
And congrats to our, our good friend Marco.
On a tremendous IndyCar career. 20 Indy 500 starts.
That's nuts. What are you
Speaker 2: At? I'm at nine. Tim,
Speaker 1: How about you? How
Speaker 3: Many have I, have I been to Speaker 1: ?
No, no, just asking anybody you've started.
Speaker 3: Oh. Um, um, you know who keeps track?
Speaker 1: I mean, most people who do 'em, ,
you have a pretty accurate tally.
Speaker 2: Uh, James is really too short of what he should be here.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm, I'm, I'm I'm the same as you, but I have Right.
Two, two attempts that didn't go super well. Uh, .
Speaker 3: Why? What happened? Speaker 1: Well, one of 'em,
I just didn't qualify Tim
and the other one I nearly died. So one
Speaker 2: Of 'em, Tim, basically what happened is one of 'em,
you forgot to turn the other one right?
He forgot to stay flat.
Speaker 1: I forgot to go fast. . No, I was, I was flat. I was flat.
I know, I know. It was, I I tried 11, qualified
for 10, started nine.
It's a weird stat. It's a weird, weird thing there.
Speaker 2: I mean, that's actually kind of, kind of cool. Yeah.
Speaker 1: There's more in there
Speaker 3: To have.
Like if you got like eight top tens
or like seven something, you know.
Speaker 1: Oh, like keep the, keep the thing going.
Yeah. Yeah. I'd have to look into that
Speaker 3: One poll.
Speaker 1: Have to look into that. You know how that goes. Yeah.
We know where it ends. Yeah. Um, some,
Speaker 2: It's, it's like, what is that Christmas song
with the turtle doves and stuff? Uh,
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: 12 days of 12 days and Christmas. 12 days.
Speaker 2: The 12 days of HCH racing.
Speaker 1: The 11 things of Hinch at Indy. So
Speaker 3: The what, when's the last time an Andretti
hasn't raced in the Indy
Speaker 1: 519 58?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Maybe me Bele will just carry on this year.
Speaker 3: Or Mira's got a really step upper game.
Speaker 1: Luca, we need Luca to, I mean, he is the right age.
We need to get him in. That's a great question actually,
Timbo, because it would've been before Michael,
but when Mario was doing F1
or something Right. When he was over there.
Speaker 3: I mean, we would, this is why we need
some of your stats guys. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Like, it's gotta be, it's gotta be like, like seventies
Speaker 3: Marcos had such a, such a good track record at the 500.
I mean even I was just thinking about that,
that first one from oh six a few nights ago on
what could have been there and just, I don't know.
It's gonna be weird. It's
Speaker 2: Um, it's gonna be very weird
because I don't know, it's Yeah, you're right.
And Andretti has been a staple of
the speedway for so long.
It'll be interesting if he comes. I doubt it. But maybe
Speaker 3: I feel like I wouldn't if I were him. I don't
Speaker 2: Know. He's a pretty,
Speaker 1: He's a pretty Speaker 2: Savvy business guy,
so I could see him being in some ambassador to role of,
of some brand of doing something
and like probably making more money doing
that than he was driving the race car. Like
Speaker 1: Mario's better market thing to do. Yeah.
Speaker 3: But I also imagine there's gotta be a poll to like,
just watch it from home, right?
To just have that be the first time.
The Indy 500 is a, is a normal day.
Speaker 1: I think if you were stepping away from the sport
and we're kind of making the conscious decision to kind
of really completely step away from the sport
and really never go back to a track for any reason
or have any connection,
then yes, I've gotta understand that.
But I, I don't know, I don't see that being the case.
I don't see Marco being the kind of guy
that's gonna start hanging around, you know,
10 races a year or anything like that.
But indie's different in India is special.
I think to Alex's point,
there's some opportunities for him there.
Um, and I don't know man, like there's, there's,
if, if he's made that decision,
he's at peace with that decision.
There'll be something cool about going
and experiencing the Indie 500 without the pressure
of being a driver or without the pressure
of your dad being in the race.
Like, he's literally never had that his entire life.
He's either been in it or a family member's been in it.
And so you might like, I can't wait for the day
where I can just go sit in the turn one stands
and drink beer and watch Danny 500.
Like I think that would be awesome.
Speaker 3: Let me be your guide. Speaker 1: , maybe
Speaker 3: This is, I'll reach out to Mark.
I'll be like, Hey, let me show you
how it's properly done. , lemme
Speaker 1: Show you what the, the co lots like on Saturday night,
what the snake pits like Sunday morning
and how to get into numerous hospitality suites without
being invited their beer.
You have no business being in. Yeah. Um, yeah. Well, cool.
We'll see. I, I mean I hope I, I hope he comes.
I would love to see him there in May. I'd love to
Speaker 3: Get, he also announced Speaker 1: He's writing a book, so we got
that to look forward to.
There you go. That'll be a I can't, I can't wait for that.
Can't wait. Can some stories in that? Wait, yeah.
I'm actually gonna have to go through.
I'm not gonna you to proofread that. Proofread that
Speaker 2: Before it goes out .
Yeah. I think all of us
Speaker 1: Could be a little trouble on that one.
Yeah. Yeah. Oh, good days. Um, okay.
So, uh, last, so racing stuff, now that we've covered fruit
and retirements over the last 30 minutes, um,
racing stuff, Alex did you, did you pay attention
to the Mexico City Grand Prix at all?
Speaker 2: I watched, I watched all of it. I watched it all.
Speaker 1: Amazing. I think what I want to talk about is,
so we can get to like
what happened and who won and all that stuff.
But I really wanna talk about all the corner cutting
and what your opinion was on all that.
'cause like turn one lap one, you had Maxus
turns one, two, and three.
You had Le Claire skip turn two
and everybody came back on in places
and there were no penalties
or reordering assessed later in the race.
Hamilton cuts a corner, a penalties assessed.
What is your take on all said lawn mowing. Oh.
And then actually for step, and did it again
while racing Hamilton,
Speaker 2: A little relief that inconsistency exists
seemingly in all forms of motor racing in terms of the
stewarding and policing and rules making.
And we've always said, we've always said it's a
thankless job, right?
Yes. And, and I do believe that, um,
and I'm sure the FIA has their reasons, like you wouldn't,
they're not making these decisions blindfolded
and just pointing at something. It's not a lottery.
Speaker 1: I'm not throwing darts at a dartboard. Right.
Speaker 2: Um, does that mean I agree with it?
No, but I, I
I I don't know, I guess
Speaker 1: I disagree Break with this
Speaker 2: More if we, if we break it down.
I, I disagree with the Lewis penalty.
I just, that one seems a little bit,
it just seems a little bit weird.
Like again, we come back
to the consistency factor of it, right?
It's like if you're gonna penalize like the FIA
and that Formula one is
so uptight about track limits, right?
Like we see it all the time in qualifying, like it's,
you're a millimeter over a white line
and it's a black and white rule.
So fine. They, they enforce it
and everyone knows that they're playing by that rule
and you have to drive accordingly.
They're pretty, they're pretty black
and white about track limits in, in racing.
They're pretty black and white about owning a corner, right?
Even if you're the inside guy
and you fire someone off, as long as you're
by their front axle, like it's your corner
and the other guy has to, has to let you by,
even if it's a complete dive bomb.
So again, they're black and white about it
and I just, it's, it seemed like Mexico they weren't.
And that's where the frustration comes in.
It's not the the penalty or the lack of penalty.
It's, it's why are some getting penalties and,
and others not, I guess is my biggest complaint.
Speaker 1: Completely agree. I think when they tried to
explain it mm-hmm .
The prevailing thought was that,
and the term, one thing, Tappin kind of went in and forth
and kind of came out in fourth
Speaker 2: Mm-hmm .
Speaker 1: So they said there was no advantage gained.
The caveat being to George Russell's point,
and this is a very IndyCar thing, Hey, the drivers
that stayed on track should have some sort of benefit here.
Because if you could just go in
and forth launched on the outside,
and if you, if it sticks, awesome,
but if it doesn't, there's no penalty, there's no downside.
Why aren't you just doing that every lap? Right? Right.
Not every lap, but like every opportunity. Yes. Mm-hmm .
Totally fair. And that part I agree with.
So for the way that their rules are written,
sure Max didn't get a penalty,
but I can see why George thought he
should and don't disagree.
The Lewis one's a little different
because the Lewis one, what he got a penalty
for was leaving track and gaining an advantage.
And because he went into the corner side by side
with Max came outta the corner four seconds ahead of Max
and didn't back up at all.
They're like, well that's a lasting advantage.
Now that advantage was exacerbated because he, George
and Bearman all started racing
each other through four and five.
Had max just gone through by himself,
that advantage wouldn't have been as big.
And so like from the Ferrari pit stand, how are you supposed
to look at that
and be like, Hmm, if we back up
to only being a second in front,
maybe they won't do anything, but if we stay here they will.
Like, it's really hard to know
what the judgment call is gonna be there.
And because there were others that didn't really
have consequence, it seemed a little harsh that he got one,
but I don't
Speaker 2: Know, like old.
So, so like if we look at, if we look at the start
of the race and the max penalty
or the max instance,
I don't think Max should have got a penalty for it.
Um, because you know, he was,
I I don't feel like he was trying to fire it.
Speaker 1: No, I agree around
Speaker 2: The outside, like he got pushed onto a curb.
We all know how dirty Mexico City is offline.
He locked up on, as soon
as he got on the curb, he was three wide.
He wasn't gonna crash out two cars by turning in.
He wasn't getting the speed out of it.
And he almost took it like the fact
that he didn't crash is incredible.
Have you seen unbelievable like the, the the a the onboard
and the view from Mike turn three, like
Speaker 1: It's the onboard is insane.
Speaker 2: Incredible. So he definitely didn't do that on purpose.
Um, and that is what you would deem a racing incident
where I think I IndyCar
did a really good job is when you look at the
Portland situation, right?
Mm-hmm . So for, for a lot of years Portland was uh,
just a complete, as you know, James was a complete debacle
and turn one lap one and Kyle Novac.
And, and the stewards were sick and tired of it.
Like it was, it was pathetic that we can't get
through turn one every single year.
And so what they did was they, they, they said
that if you cut behind the turn two curb at
that sequence in Portland on lap one,
it doesn't matter if you were pushed there,
it doesn't matter if it was an honest
mistake that got you there.
It does not matter how you ended up there.
If you do not go left hand down
and get through the chica barricade setup
and rejoin the track that way,
you are immediately going to the back.
You have to treat that white line
and that area behind the turn two curb
as a wall end of discussion.
And what happened from that point?
Everyone played nice through there
and it was all of the incidents went away
and we've now gotten through Portland three years in a row
through turn one essentially. So
Speaker 1: Must be nice Speaker 2: F so F1,
I'm not saying do you have to do that?
You, you can't obviously do that for every track.
But, but there needs to be something that's done
because there are so many tracks
with this massive amount of runoff.
And this isn't, Mexico's not really an example
'cause it's not like it's a paved runoff.
Right. The fact, again, like we said,
that Maxin crash is crazy.
But I do think because a lot
of the way their tracks are set up, there needs
to be a more hard and fast rule like they have at Monza,
like they have with track limits and qualifying that if you
Speaker 1: Montreal final, she came Montreal, they've
Speaker 2: Got that.
If you, if cut a corner, you have, you have to,
you have to go mm-hmm .
And pay your penalty. So that way there's no speculation of
how much of an advantage did he gain or did he not
because they were fighting or he was going through the grass
so he couldn't have gained that
much and, and that sort of thing.
It's just, it's rule it's done with everyone knows it
and they play by it because if that's the case,
I don't think Max puts his, again, max didn't intentionally
ship it in there, go off for sure.
I don't, I don't think he goes three wide there
and exposes himself to that in the position he is in.
He probably has to lift and stays in forth
and tries to work his way through the two Ferraris.
Through through the complex.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Or, or even if there was like gravel in that corner.
Speaker 2: Also true. Speaker 1: Also true.
Like is that gonna make guys just behave better? Yeah.
Um, either way Lando won it running away, which was
a super impressive drive all weekend long qualifying the
race just absolutely dominated.
Now you're world championship leader, which is kind
of cool when you think about the fact
that he lost 18 points in Zan VT
through something not of his own doing.
Um, Oscar again had a bit of an off weekend,
but I thought did a really good job in the race, kind
of found his rhythm, found his groove a bit more, and,
and got back up to fifth, nearly fourth.
But Oliver Bearman hung on to fourth for his best finish
of his career and a tied best finish for Haas,
which was pretty freaking cool.
Um, I mean he ran up in a podium spot for a long time there.
It's just, you know, max got him at the end.
Do you think that P'S kinda lost his edge
and that it's Lambos to lose now?
Or do you think he's just had two bad weekends
and when we get to, I mean Brazil,
he could blitz the field like he'd done at, you know, five
or six tracks this year.
No, I don't. Do you think it's
substantial or do you think he's in his head?
Speaker 2: I I would find it hard to believe
that Oscar would be flustered.
Um, I think he was better
at Coda than the result show.
I think everyone's gonna lose to Max in Brazil.
So I think really it's, it's Vegas
and, um, guitar cutter, whatever you wanna call it,
where Oscar's gonna have to, to show what he is made of.
And, and I think those are tracks
that should suit him very, very well.
So I think tho that if, if he comes out of those two,
like still missing a couple tens to Lando, then yeah,
it was a, it was a mental breakdown,
but I don't imagine that being the case.
Speaker 1: And then I guess the, the other way to look at it is,
is he losing his edge or is Lando just really stepped it up
because even in the first half of the year, a lot
of people would argue that Lando was maybe
that little bit quicker over
overlap, but made more mistakes.
So did Lando just sort his program out
and now it's just harder to beat and
because everybody else has developed their cars a little bit
more than the McLaren there's just more cars in the mix now,
so they're not just fighting over first
and second anymore and Yeah,
Speaker 2: I don't know.
It's tough to say. You know, it's,
I was half say was expecting with how dominant Lando was in,
in qualifying, I was half expecting him
to bottle up a lap at some point.
Um, and he never did. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Like that's, that's the thing, right? And was on
Speaker 2: Pull by like three tens. So yeah,
Speaker 1: That's a good chunk.
He executed very well over, over the weekend.
Maybe his best Grand Prix weekend total. I
Speaker 2: Agree. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Of his career for sure.
And when you consider, we've said that already this year,
it shows that he's still getting better. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Good point. Good point.
I still think, I still think, um, max is super alive in this
because he's gonna, he's gonna, he's gonna win the sprint
and the feature in Brazil, just book it.
Very good chance. Like that's gonna happen.
Speaker 1: There's any weather, it's a done deal. Well,
Speaker 2: Even if there's not, like he's so good there.
So then I, I imagine it's a 25 ish point
gap with three to go.
Like,
Speaker 1: And I think Vegas is gonna suit the Red Bull better than
the McLaren Mm.
Um, Qatar should be a McLaren one too.
Speaker 2: Well it seems like hands down,
but any track that is in the
United States of America, max just
Speaker 1: Max wins.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Speaker 1: So true. Yeah, he's good there.
All right, so weekend off, we, we,
I think we last spoke you were doing your testing,
but the second day got canceled, right?
Speaker 2: Hmm. Do we, yeah. Interesting.
Do we not go, do we not go over the damper stuff and,
and all that sort of jazz?
I don't think we did. Tammy, did we do that?
I don't think we did. No, we did not. Okay.
Well should we run through it quickly?
Um, let's run through it quickly.
Let's probably some fruit chat. He can trim down . Yeah.
So absolutely not.
So yes, IMS test I, the second day
was really focused on the, uh, the spec damper
or the idea of a spec damper.
Um, the first day was spent going through breaks and,
and we already talked about why that's, uh,
a, a positive thing.
Um, and seems like those are and worked.
Those are, those are going ahead for 2026,
which is great news.
Um, the dampers are a project
or an idea of a project for 2028.
Um, there's a lot of conversation about it.
People correctly assume that a series would want
to go to a spec damper, um,
to help alleviate some of the cost, right?
And while that is part of it, that is not the main reason.
Um, so the, uh, the new car, obviously there's,
there's a huge push, um, from everyone, um, drivers, fans,
the series itself, uh, to reduce the weight of it.
And, um, custom dampers,
especially street course dampers weigh a lot, you know, all
of the, the, the inverter technology and,
and everything that goes into these dampers all attached
to them because they're open and unlimited.
They're just, they just add componentry and stuff and things
and, and they end up being pretty heavy.
Um, so there was an idea that it would be a pretty
decent win-win, um, to reduce cost
and save weight as a, as a two twofer.
Um, if the dampers like a spec damper was up to the task.
And lemme just tell you James, um,
there's a reason why teams spend seven figures on a damper
program and it's been going on for the better part
of a decade and all of these things Yeah,
because you don't crash.
Like it's not, the car doesn't become undrivable. Yeah.
It doesn't become a a <inaudible> box.
It, it, it's all fine and it all works seemingly okay.
But there is a, there's a substantial lack of grip,
or I should say a grip reduction.
And if you're feeling that, um,
on a 51 degree day, which is what we were having
by yourself at Max Downforce, like that's a pretty grave
and extreme problem coming to the month
of May when you're in traffic.
And it's 82 degrees on Memorial Day
with 123 degree track tent.
So mm-hmm . Um, the spec damper project, while
not Impossible, is seemingly something that is
not incredibly viable, um, just
because of how far away
they are from the dampers that all the teams have developed
for this period of time.
And kind of like we discussed
on the last episode, like there is something to be said
for not being a completely spec championship, right?
Yeah. And I think that's part of the allure
of IndyCar racing, um, to engineers and to designers
and to mechanics and that sort of thing.
And there isn't a huge push from the teams themselves
to like get rid of the damper program.
So this was more of a, the, the, the series is,
is doing their due diligence
and trying to look at all avenues to, to save costs,
reduce weight and all this sort of thing.
And then, so they're just trying to, to tick the boxes.
And the most important place obviously is
you would wanna make sure that Indy 500 is not
negatively impacted by that.
And I think that they learned a lot last week in terms of
it would be at least with the, the damper selections
that we had at the time last
week. So that's where we're at. So
Speaker 1: Does, so does that mean they're going to keep trying?
Like it's rare you just try
something once and it doesn't work.
You're like, Hey, we're not gonna go any further. I
Speaker 2: Don't speak for them, but it, it, I I it didn't seem like
Speaker 1: Get them to Speaker 2: Pri it didn't seem
that anyone was surprised with the results.
It's not like people were like, oh my God, really?
It was like, yeah,
Speaker 1: Because then the, the question kind of becomes if
to get it to the same grip level,
you've gotta add all the same stuff.
We're not actually saving any weight,
so what's the point? Correct,
Speaker 2: Correct.
Right. So it, it was, they were, again,
going through the due diligence.
It didn't cost anything to do it.
Um, it was a safe test because me and Kuma both did it
and it wasn't diabolical and, and that sort of thing.
And, and, and him and I both blindly, like we, we joined
at the end of the day and had a group kind of debrief
and discussion with, with IndyCar and the,
and um, Olin, uh, the Damper company
and our respective engineers
and like without speaking to each other, everyone kind
of came to the same conclusion.
So it was, it was all very productive.
Um, and again, happy to be a part of it.
Speaker 1: This is why we test and Speaker 2: I head
to Phoenix next week, so that should be cool.
Speaker 1: Phoenix Tire Test,
Speaker 2: Phoenix Tire Arrow and Arrow Test. Yeah,
Speaker 1: That's gonna be very interesting. Very interesting
Speaker 2: Slash important.
Speaker 1: Getting ready for our NASCAR IndyCar
double header at Phoenix next year.
Speaker 2: Yes sir. Speaker 1: Sure. Which is gonna be fun. Cool.
Okay, well good place to end.
But as you mentioned Phoenix,
and that leads to our NASCAR IndyCar double header.
Let's just casually mention that in absence
of an IndyCar race or an F1 race next weekend,
there is in fact the NASCAR championship decider at Phoenix.
Um, Hamlin, Briscoe, Larson, Byron,
those are your four that are going for it.
And I'm very curious to see how it all shakes out.
'cause I think Byron was the regular season champ.
Denny has won everything but a championship
and wants to shake that, you know, best driver,
a never win championship thing.
Mm-hmm . Mm-hmm . All while suing nascar.
Very interesting dynamic. Good for him.
Got Larson, who's done it, Briscoe, who's been strong.
So, uh, I'm gonna watch, I'm gonna watch that race because
Speaker 2: I'm gonna be honest, I'm curious. I'm not. And, um,
Speaker 1: Well, you're gonna be betting on, on, so I'm
Speaker 3: All about the Breeder's Cup this weekend.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So I will pay a lot of attention to that.
And you pay a lot of attention to nascar.
And then we will talk about it next week. Okay.
Speaker 1: Well, let's text update each other as the weekend goes on
so that way we have some understanding
of each other's programs.
And that way we can discuss on the show.
And it's not just like two monologues of Yes. Beer Cup.
Go Phoenix. Go Tim. As usual.
He'll contribute next to nothing and
Speaker 3: People will still complain that I talk too
much. Speaker 2: .
Speaker 1: This has been off track with Hinch
and Rossi Off Track is part
of the Sirius XM Sports Podcast Network.
If you enjoyed this episode
and want to hear more, please give a five star
rating and leave a review.
Subscribe today, wherever you stream your podcasts.
We are at Ask Off Track on Twitter and Instagram.
And if you wanna follow us on Twitter, we're at Hinch Town
and at Alexander Rossi.
If you wanna follow them, though,
we have no idea why you would.
He's at the Tim Durham on Twitter.
Find us on YouTube and subscribe to our channel
for exclusive video content.
Off Track is produced by Tim Durham, and by that we mean f.